Gravity

All other paranormal and conspiracies.
Post Reply
aeon
Posts: 622
Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2016 5:42 pm
Contact:

Gravity

Post by aeon » Thu Mar 09, 2017 4:09 pm

http://dinosaurtheory.com/scaling.html

http://www.dinox.org/index.html

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/cienc ... aurs01.htm

http://fathom.lib.uchicago.edu/2/21701757/

viewtopic.php?f=4&t=94


Shaver's giant Titans are not impossible if the ancient pre-flood world had different gravity, atmospheric pressure and composition. The giant dinosaurs in museums are equally impossible, which is why the giant skeletons are all fake, they are plastic and wire with special coatings. If those were real, especially if fossilized they would break under their own weight and break the floor. You would require massive steel reinforcements.

We do not even have real giant mega fauna living today. Why? Our present world would not support them. Air pressure is too low and dis energy disrupts the cells ability to store Exd.

Museum: of the Greek Muses, literally means inspiration or fanciful history. It is a sideshow like Ringling Bros. and Barnum & Bailey Circus.

Neither the present atmosphere or gravity would allow dinosaurs. Their bones would shatter and their organs collapse.

What we call "gravity" is not Newtonian gravity which is impossible for it breaks the laws of physics. Newtonian gravity could only operate by magic.

Shaver said what we call gravity is the inflow of exd from outer space. In ancient times the exd levels were different. Titans pumped exd into their bodies making them a dozen times stronger. It is said the 50 foot titans would sink a few inches into solid rock which is why they always migrated away from puny worlds like Earth.

These Comments were found at the bottom of this page:
http://www.blueblurrylines.com/2017/02/ ... e-and.html

https://irl.cs.ucla.edu/papers/right-size.pdf
Also: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Square-cube_law

" To quote from Haldane's seminal essay On Being the Right Size, "...consider a man 60 feet high...Giant Pope and Giant Pagan in the illustrated Pilgrim's Progress.... These monsters...weighed 1000 times as much as Christian. Every square inch of a giant bone had to support 10 times the weight borne by a square inch of human bone. As the human thigh-bone breaks under about 10 times the human weight, Pope and Pagan would have broken their thighs every time they took a step." Consequently, most animals show allometric scaling with increased size, both among species and within a species. The giant creatures seen in monster movies (e.g., Godzilla or King Kong) are also unrealistic, as their sheer size would force them to collapse."
·
Reply
Curt Collins
1 week ago

Thanks for your comments, Ray. Before leaping to conclusions that Shaver was wrong, let's remember that like all the greats, some of his teachings are parables. First let's look for the truths it could contain.

If the Devil's Tower was somehow not naturally occurring, it's certainly something well within the limits of the ancient Atlan ray technology to produce (probably to provide Noah with wood for the ark). As Charles Fort and MUFON columnist Stanton Friedman have so ably shown us, as often as not, "Science was Wrong."

As to the great beasts of the earth, I'll leave you with this.
"History shows again and again.
How nature points out the folly of men."


aeon
Posts: 622
Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2016 5:42 pm
Contact:

Re: Gravity

Post by aeon » Sat Mar 11, 2017 3:41 pm

"Mutan Mion explains that gravity is the friction of condensing exd, ex-disentegrance, falling through matter into earth. By using a beam of similarly condensing particles of ex-disintegrance a harmless beam of upward gravity is obtained which can levitate matter slowly or drive it upward at immense speed. All space is filled with the ash from disintegrance of the suns of the universe. This, condensing again into matter, is integrance or gravity."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Le_Sage%2 ... ravitation

http://www.keelynet.com/gravity/wright.htm

http://www.feandft.com/


User avatar
Ye Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 281
Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2016 2:34 pm
Contact:

Re: Gravity

Post by Ye Admin » Sat May 04, 2019 6:05 pm

gravity-is-a-push-pic-1024x748.jpg
gravity-is-a-push-pic-1024x748.jpg (114.57 KiB) Viewed 3507 times

Ye Ed last saw him over 30 years ago... It was odd, he had constructed a wooden town in his backyard, a sort of playground for his sons, Tim and Tom. All of the constructs were large enough for small kids to sit inside. By the time Ye Ed got there, they were in sad shape and falling apart... but Ye Ed managed to photograph them, back then, on film.

Article by Tom Wade

Starting in 1968, the late Walter C. Wright Jr., a lifelong Fairfield resident, challenged the accepted norm that gravity was a pulling force with his conclusion that it was instead a push.

Some may feel it would take an astounding amount of audacity for a nonscientist to try to disprove Sir Isaac Newton’s Universal Law of Gravitation, but Wright relied not on chutzpah, but his knowledge of electronics and what he called “horse sense.”

Newton’s law states that any two bodies in the universe attract each other with a force that is directly proportional to the product of their masses and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them.

Wright insisted that Newton had come close, but instead of attracting, celestial bodies repulsed each other the way two magnets do when the same poles are near each other.

After more than a decade of research and experimentation, Wright published the book “Gravity is a Push” in 1979.

Wright’s interest in gravitational forces began in 1962 when his youngest son, Tom, then 6 years old, told him one day he did not believe Newton’s theory of gravity.

For whatever reason, it wasn’t until six years later that Wright asked his son why. According to the first chapter in his book, this was his son’s reply:

If the side of the Earth that is facing our moon has a high tide, then why does our Earth also have a high tide at the same time on the opposite side?
If the moon pulls our water, then why doesn’t the moon pull this water all the way to the moon?
If the moon pulls our water, then why doesn’t the moon have moisture?

Wright’s book, which is chock full of illustrations and diagrams, has a conversational tone in many parts. He makes no bones about the fact that neither he nor his sons are scientists.

“We were strictly novices and we did not know Venus from Di Milo or Pluto from Plato, but it did seem odd to us that if gravity was a pull, then why weren’t heavenly bodies all stuck together like a bunch of grapes?” he wrote.

Wright turned his home on Ohio Street into a museum where he proudly displayed numerous models he claimed bolstered his theory. He also made approximately 30 videotapes which can now be viewed on YouTube.

Walter Clyde Wright Jr. (called “Red” by his friends) was born June 21, 1918, in the town of Cement and moved to Fairfield 10 years later. He was a 1936 graduate of Armijo High School, an Army veteran of World War II and worked for the Southern Pacific Railroad for four decades. He later taught electronics at an adult school and at Napa Community College.

The concept of gravity being a repulsive force rather than an attractive one did not originate with Wright. Swiss mathematician Nicolas Fatio de Duillier espoused a similar theory in 1690, which French physicist Georges-Louis Le Sage sharpened in 1748.

Wright issued challenges to the California Department of Education, the National Geographic Society and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration to present working models that backed up their claims or disapproved his.

Some have agreed that Wright was on to something, while others dismiss his findings out of hand.

Wright may not have helped his case to be taken seriously in the larger scientific community by using a Slinky toy in an experiment or sharing a story in his book about how his son Tom claimed at 5 years old to have had a past life. Wright speculated that perhaps his son had lived in a different galaxy of higher intelligence and knew what gravity really was all about.

Nonetheless, Wright and his theories are still being discussed and debated online even though he died in 2011.

“Gravity is a Push” is now out of print, but a first printing signed by Wright is available at the Solano County library. Wright just asked that readers digest his findings with an open mind.

Source: https://www.dailyrepublic.com/all-dr-ne ... is-a-push/

aeon
Posts: 622
Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2016 5:42 pm
Contact:

Re: Gravity

Post by aeon » Sat May 04, 2019 7:52 pm

Shaver said that when he experienced the thought records he saw much he did not comprehend. I am convinced Newtonian gravity can't exist. Shaver seemed pretty sure that infalling Exd ash put us under some form of pressure. The only example I could find that comes close is the cosmic ray background bombardment. Tesla thought that energy could be harnessed. Is it Exd? I don't know. Cosmic radiation may be the result of Exd friction or its collision with matter, dropping its frequency and giving off cosmic rays.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests